<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Charlotte Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The Blog Companion to Charlotte Talks with Mike Collins.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday, July 21, Offshore Drilling by Dave P.</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/monday-july-21-offshore-drilling/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=229#comment-725</guid>
		<description>I'm curious as to how drilling proponents expect that new offshore drilling would lead to a reduced dependence on what people continue to falsely call "foreign" oil. I could be wrong, but it seems that being the globally traded commodity that it is, oil retrieved from deposits off of the NC coast would be just as likely to end up in Europe as in Charlotte.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious as to how drilling proponents expect that new offshore drilling would lead to a reduced dependence on what people continue to falsely call &#8220;foreign&#8221; oil. I could be wrong, but it seems that being the globally traded commodity that it is, oil retrieved from deposits off of the NC coast would be just as likely to end up in Europe as in Charlotte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday, July 21, Offshore Drilling by Peggy</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/monday-july-21-offshore-drilling/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=229#comment-721</guid>
		<description>There was an excellent segment on this topic during the July 18th Science Friday program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was an excellent segment on this topic during the July 18th Science Friday program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday, July 21, Offshore Drilling by James</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/monday-july-21-offshore-drilling/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=229#comment-720</guid>
		<description>How many leases, and acres, are Piedmont, their partners, their suppliers, etc., sitting on right now that are neither being explored or if known drilled? 

How long have they had these leases?


Why haven't these companies, if not going to use the present multi-million acres of leases, not giving them to other companies or startups?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many leases, and acres, are Piedmont, their partners, their suppliers, etc., sitting on right now that are neither being explored or if known drilled? </p>
<p>How long have they had these leases?</p>
<p>Why haven&#8217;t these companies, if not going to use the present multi-million acres of leases, not giving them to other companies or startups?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday, July 21, Offshore Drilling by George</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/monday-july-21-offshore-drilling/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=229#comment-719</guid>
		<description>I have heard multiple claims that "nothing happened" when Katrina and Rita went through the Gulf Coast in 2005, and that is simply not true. Your guests have said there was a "low impact."

According to the Norwegian firm MMS that did the official report from the disaster reported the following:

Unsurprisingly, this devastation caused significant spillage, according to the official report prepared for the MMS by a Norwegian firm:

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Caused 124 Offshore Spills For A Total Of 743,700 Gallons. 554,400 gallons were crude oil and condensate from platforms, rigs and pipelines, and 189,000 gallons were refined products from platforms and rigs. [MMS, 1/22/07]

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Caused Six Offshore Spills Of 42,000 Gallons Or Greater. The largest of these was 152,250 gallons, well over the 100,000 gallon threshhold considered a “major spill.” [MMS, 5/1/06]

Add into the fact that the onshore spills from Katrina were in excess of 9 million gallons, and even the Houston Chronicle stated:

"The quantity and cumulative magnitude of the 595 spills, which were spread across four states and struck offshore and inland, rank these two hurricanes among the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history." http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3457319.html

This was not a low impact story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard multiple claims that &#8220;nothing happened&#8221; when Katrina and Rita went through the Gulf Coast in 2005, and that is simply not true. Your guests have said there was a &#8220;low impact.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to the Norwegian firm MMS that did the official report from the disaster reported the following:</p>
<p>Unsurprisingly, this devastation caused significant spillage, according to the official report prepared for the MMS by a Norwegian firm:</p>
<p>Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Caused 124 Offshore Spills For A Total Of 743,700 Gallons. 554,400 gallons were crude oil and condensate from platforms, rigs and pipelines, and 189,000 gallons were refined products from platforms and rigs. [MMS, 1/22/07]</p>
<p>Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Caused Six Offshore Spills Of 42,000 Gallons Or Greater. The largest of these was 152,250 gallons, well over the 100,000 gallon threshhold considered a “major spill.” [MMS, 5/1/06]</p>
<p>Add into the fact that the onshore spills from Katrina were in excess of 9 million gallons, and even the Houston Chronicle stated:</p>
<p>&#8220;The quantity and cumulative magnitude of the 595 spills, which were spread across four states and struck offshore and inland, rank these two hurricanes among the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history.&#8221; <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3457319.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3457319.html</a></p>
<p>This was not a low impact story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monday, June 23, 365 Nights of Intimacy by Eddie</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/monday-june-23-365-nights-of-intimacy/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=146#comment-717</guid>
		<description>I think the title is lame. There are other ways to keep a loving marriage running smoothly without having to make a ridiculous gift of 365 days of intimacy. They will wear each other out. And something else comes to mind, What do they do when they come upon a leap year when you have 366 days instead of 365?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the title is lame. There are other ways to keep a loving marriage running smoothly without having to make a ridiculous gift of 365 days of intimacy. They will wear each other out. And something else comes to mind, What do they do when they come upon a leap year when you have 366 days instead of 365?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday, July 18, The State of Banking by Gary</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/friday-july-18-the-state-of-banking/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-716</guid>
		<description>There is no more poisonous sentence than 'the government is the only solution'.  The government does absolutely nothing well, even things that are fundamental to all governments such as protection and arbitration.  The government's solely responsibility is to protect me from my neighbor...  it goes too far when it tries to protect me from myself, ie, if I want a subprime loan, I should be able to  secure one and another party should be allowed to be in the business of selling me that loan.  Free markets depend entirely on trust and the markets creatively destruct players that accumulate mistrust [like subprime lenders].  To quote Adam Smith, "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest."  

The market will correct out this problem, just like it does every other one.  If government performs bailouts [of any player] it will prevent creative destruction to restore balance and promote growth.  Bailouts only encourage future bad behavior.  Moreover, it is blatantly unconstitutional for the government to interfere with private contracts [ie the agreement between you and your loan underwriter].  If the loan agreement is too much for a person [and the interest rate is not buried deep in it but it's the crux of the loan and prominently on page one], there is recourse, such as having a lawyer represent your self interest.  What's a few hundred dollars in the face of a several hundred thousand contract?

Poor Adam Smith spins in his grave to hear such talk as governments as a solution to these matters.  America's market economy is a direct result of Smith's Wealth of Nations and we would not have become a world power with the finest economy ever seen without him.  This style of economics ignited world productivity after a thousand  stagnate years of mercantilism and feudal economics that failed to raise the standards.  Smith's theories gave birth to the Industrial Revolution and the quality of life we now enjoy.  

America's problem now [which I see in Elizabeth] is that we all are capitalists when we are enjoying profits but suddenly turn fabian socialist when we are expected to take a loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no more poisonous sentence than &#8216;the government is the only solution&#8217;.  The government does absolutely nothing well, even things that are fundamental to all governments such as protection and arbitration.  The government&#8217;s solely responsibility is to protect me from my neighbor&#8230;  it goes too far when it tries to protect me from myself, ie, if I want a subprime loan, I should be able to  secure one and another party should be allowed to be in the business of selling me that loan.  Free markets depend entirely on trust and the markets creatively destruct players that accumulate mistrust [like subprime lenders].  To quote Adam Smith, &#8220;It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The market will correct out this problem, just like it does every other one.  If government performs bailouts [of any player] it will prevent creative destruction to restore balance and promote growth.  Bailouts only encourage future bad behavior.  Moreover, it is blatantly unconstitutional for the government to interfere with private contracts [ie the agreement between you and your loan underwriter].  If the loan agreement is too much for a person [and the interest rate is not buried deep in it but it's the crux of the loan and prominently on page one], there is recourse, such as having a lawyer represent your self interest.  What&#8217;s a few hundred dollars in the face of a several hundred thousand contract?</p>
<p>Poor Adam Smith spins in his grave to hear such talk as governments as a solution to these matters.  America&#8217;s market economy is a direct result of Smith&#8217;s Wealth of Nations and we would not have become a world power with the finest economy ever seen without him.  This style of economics ignited world productivity after a thousand  stagnate years of mercantilism and feudal economics that failed to raise the standards.  Smith&#8217;s theories gave birth to the Industrial Revolution and the quality of life we now enjoy.  </p>
<p>America&#8217;s problem now [which I see in Elizabeth] is that we all are capitalists when we are enjoying profits but suddenly turn fabian socialist when we are expected to take a loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday, July 18, The State of Banking by Elizabeth B</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/friday-july-18-the-state-of-banking/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-713</guid>
		<description>I am just waiting for the inevitable call saying let homeowners take the consequences for their risky loans. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face! Whatever the culpability of the individual buyers, we all pay the price from the collapse of the mortgage system as well as banks. This disaster is far from over unless Congress steps in like they did for the Savings and Loan collapse.

This is just another example of the disastrous free market fundamentalism that has been sold to us by Republicans. When will we realize that if we drastically deregulate we will continue to have these destablilizing boom and bust cycles that hurt everyone, even those who are acting responsibly. There is no way for individuals to protect themselves from these system-wide failures. 

As for who is to blame, the majority of borrowers were deliberately misled by the "experts" into loans they could not afford. Approximately 40% of those who took out subprime loans could have actually qualified for better terms but were bamboozled into taking out more risky sub prime loans. Others were not told that their rates could go up drastically. You can say they should have read the fine print but I challenge you to find anyone that actually read all the papers they signed when taking out a mortgage, let alone understood them.

Yes some people deliberately took risks but they were a minority. Why punish them when we are also punishing the entire country? 

We need reasonable regulation if we are to have a healthy, stable economy and society. Government is the only solution in this situation to stop the bleeding and to prevent more of this insanity in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just waiting for the inevitable call saying let homeowners take the consequences for their risky loans. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face! Whatever the culpability of the individual buyers, we all pay the price from the collapse of the mortgage system as well as banks. This disaster is far from over unless Congress steps in like they did for the Savings and Loan collapse.</p>
<p>This is just another example of the disastrous free market fundamentalism that has been sold to us by Republicans. When will we realize that if we drastically deregulate we will continue to have these destablilizing boom and bust cycles that hurt everyone, even those who are acting responsibly. There is no way for individuals to protect themselves from these system-wide failures. </p>
<p>As for who is to blame, the majority of borrowers were deliberately misled by the &#8220;experts&#8221; into loans they could not afford. Approximately 40% of those who took out subprime loans could have actually qualified for better terms but were bamboozled into taking out more risky sub prime loans. Others were not told that their rates could go up drastically. You can say they should have read the fine print but I challenge you to find anyone that actually read all the papers they signed when taking out a mortgage, let alone understood them.</p>
<p>Yes some people deliberately took risks but they were a minority. Why punish them when we are also punishing the entire country? </p>
<p>We need reasonable regulation if we are to have a healthy, stable economy and society. Government is the only solution in this situation to stop the bleeding and to prevent more of this insanity in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thursday, July 17, Large Scale Charities by les</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/thursday-july-17-large-scale-charities/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=218#comment-712</guid>
		<description>i make less than 50k per year and my company has a large drive every year to donate to the unitedway. it's a full born endorsement to donate. all of these donations do not come full any skill sets that this person brings to this chairity. i have donated in the past but i see that over the 8 years working and donating to this chairity has my money only going to support her cause. i will never give any more of my money to this chairity, insted i will give elseware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i make less than 50k per year and my company has a large drive every year to donate to the unitedway. it&#8217;s a full born endorsement to donate. all of these donations do not come full any skill sets that this person brings to this chairity. i have donated in the past but i see that over the 8 years working and donating to this chairity has my money only going to support her cause. i will never give any more of my money to this chairity, insted i will give elseware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thursday, July 17, Large Scale Charities by Joe</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/thursday-july-17-large-scale-charities/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=218#comment-711</guid>
		<description>SECOND CORRECTION: In the second sentence of the second paragraph of my first post, "know" should of course be "no."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SECOND CORRECTION: In the second sentence of the second paragraph of my first post, &#8220;know&#8221; should of course be &#8220;no.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thursday, July 17, Large Scale Charities by Joe</title>
		<link>http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/thursday-july-17-large-scale-charities/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlotteblogs.wordpress.com/?p=218#comment-710</guid>
		<description>CORRECTION: My last sentence should read "...anyone with a high school education *should* be able to do it."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CORRECTION: My last sentence should read &#8220;&#8230;anyone with a high school education *should* be able to do it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
